Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-15401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garzon v. The State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation et al
as 6:2015cv01850
Plaintiff:
German Garzon, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Robert A. Douglas, Stan Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
as 4:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
MARTA SCOTT
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SPRAGGINS v. WALTON COUNTY, et al
as 3:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
WALTER C SPRAGGINS
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY, WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PATRICK PILCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherif Kodsy v. State of Florida, Department o
as 11-14976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERIF RAFIK KODSY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Kodsy v State of Florida Department of Business and Professional
as 9:2011cv80633
Plaintiff:
Sherif Rafik Kodsy
Defendant:
State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
