Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Saunders v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Darrius Saunders
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and CORRECTION OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Saunders Jr v. The Center for Family Representation et al
as 1:2023cv08921
Plaintiff:
Louis Henry Saunders Jr
Defendant:
The Center for Family Representation and Tania Schrag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Urban Pathways, Inc., Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
U.P. et al v. Uniondale Union Free School District et al
as 2:2020cv05256
Defendant:
UNIONDALE HIGH SCHOOL, DR JACK ABRAMOWITZ, William K. Lloyd and others
Plaintiff:
TANICKA SMITH, U P and U.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
