Cases 1 - 10 of 13
O'Donnell et al
as 1:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Donnell and Michael Goree
Defendant:
City of Chicago and URT United Road Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lacy v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06783
Plaintiff:
Miyah Lacy
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and URT United Road Towing, Inc. d/b/a United Road Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04984
Plaintiff:
Shaniqua Davis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, URT United Road Towing, Inc. d/b/a United Road Towing, Inc., City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01379
Plaintiff:
Danyetta Walker and Joseph Walawski
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and United Road Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Sroga v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv04946
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sroga
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, Chicago Police Officers, S&S Department for the City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv01696
Plaintiff:
Martin M. Breiner
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, David Haynes, John Escalante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
