Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gupta v. Weir et al
as 6:2012cv01112
Plaintiff:
Anesh Gupta
Defendant:
K. Weir, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Chicago Field Office, Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kirk v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 8:2008cv01661
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Kirk and Michael D. Kirk
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Guardiola v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 8:2008cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Guardiola
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Majdankic v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 8:2007cv01573
Plaintiff:
Senad Majdankic
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hassan v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2007cv21632
Plaintiff:
Nouri Hassan and Nouri Hassan
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General of the United States, Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Salame v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 9:2007cv80479
Petitioner:
Diya Salame and Diya Salame
Respondent:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Karimine v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 6:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Karimine
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
