Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jackson v. Elko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Amos Jackson
Defendant:
Elko County Sheriff, Gonzales, A. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Vargas, Amy and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson and Mark Steven Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Rogers et al
as 2:2019cv01482
Plaintiff:
Shirley Vargas
Defendant:
Genesis Realty Group, Stephen Rogers and Jill Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Villalobos v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv01261
Defendant:
State of Nevada, T-Mobile USA, Matthew T Millone and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01941
Defendant:
Doe Healthcare Providers I-X, Doe Officers, Elko County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Howell et al
as 2:2014cv01942
Defendant:
Elko County, Richard Gloeckner, Amber Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villalobos v. Milone et al
as 2:2014cv01262
Defendant:
Connor P. Flynn, Jones Vargas Law Firm, Matthew T. Milone and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd et al v. Vargas
as 2:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Allen Boyd and Nikci Boyd
Defendant:
Laguros Migel Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southern Nevada Confederation of Clubs et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01093
Defendant:
J Adkisson, Joseph Chronister, Joseph Gagliardi and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Aguilar, Jose Angel Aguilar, Alex Arzola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
