Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
BANKS v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03271
Plaintiff:
NICOLE BANKS
Defendant:
City of Chicago, ALEXANDRA GIAMPAPA, Thomas Spanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bright v. Yenchko et al
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Malik Cedrick Bright
Defendant:
Jeffrey Yenchko, Victor Jurado, Hanna Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Nanez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almendarez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Arthur Almendarez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galvan v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
John Galvan
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kondilis et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Kondilis, Branden Lisciandrello, Edward Garcia and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sims v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05691
Plaintiff:
Tiwon S. Sims
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Officer Brandon Neita-Scott, Star No. 18908 and Officer Victor Alcazar, Star No. 11046
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
