Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Gorenc et al v. Klaasen et al
as 2:2018cv02403
Defendant:
Adventist Health Mid-America, Inc., Laura McMurray, Susan Dahlin and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Gorenc, Midwife Partners in Women's Wellness, LLC and Kara Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells v. Osage County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv04114
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Wells
Defendant:
Laurie Dunn and Osage County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Wells Fargo Financial National Bank et al
as 2:2017cv02536
Plaintiff:
Nolan McKenzie
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial National Bank, Empire Today, LLC and Pat Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Wells Fargo Financial National Bank et al
as 2:2017cv02540
Plaintiff:
Nolan McKenzie
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial National Bank and Empire Today, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Wine et al
as 6:2013cv01237
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Taylor Wine , Brenda B. Cherry , Douglas P. Witteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
