Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Thomas v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Thomas
Defendant:
United States District Court and District of New Mexico Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Crystyn Jeanette Smith-Thomas and Heather May Thomas
Defendant:
Alma C. Roberson, Geoffrey Cummings, Albuquerque Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thigpen v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Thigpen
Defendant:
Ian Anderson and Westlake Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Naranjo et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Thomas
Defendant:
Alexandra C Naranjo, Danielle Valdez, Mary Carmack-Altwies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Bridge et al
as 1:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Ronnie J Thomas
Defendant:
Linda Bridge, Thea Guerin and Esther Lucero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roybal v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Greg Roybal
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Aiste Chamblin, Chirag Acharya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mowrey v. Delaney
as 2:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mowrey
Defendant:
Jenifer E. Delaney and Jennifer E. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thigpen v. AmeriFirst Financial, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Thigpen
Defendant:
AmeriFirst Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thigpen v. Capital One Financial Corp.
as 1:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Thigpen
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
