Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv05901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chappelle et al v. Jeter et al
as 1:2015cv04187
Plaintiff:
Laquana Chappelle
Defendant:
Kim Jeter, Sheila Bennett, Judy Enwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabet v. Warner/Chappell Music
as 1:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Sam Arthur Sabet
Defendant:
Warner/Chappell Music
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chappelle et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2013cv08142
Plaintiff:
John Chappelle
Defendant:
City of New York, Lee and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills et al v. New York City Board of Education
as 1:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
Jewel Mills , Marc Akomeah , Daevantae Andrews and others
Defendant:
New York City Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green v. Avis Budget Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Priscilla M. Green
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group, Inc. , joe Donnelly , Christopher Neudorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Underdog Trucking, L.L.C. et al v. Cellco Partnership et al
as 1:2010cv09189
Plaintiff:
Underdog Trucking, L.L.C. and Reggie Anders
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership, Oscar Aponte, Matt Chappell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brand v. RMM et al
as 1:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brand
Defendant:
RMM, Universal Music Group, Sony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Underdog Trucking, L.L.C. et al v. Verizon Services Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv08918
Plaintiff:
Underdog Trucking, L.L.C. and Reggie Anders
Defendant:
Verizon Services Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., Oscar Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
