Cases 91 - 100 of 251
Braunstein v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Steven Braunstein
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez-Masto, Kathy Hardcastle, Brian Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Posey v. Doug Gillespie, et al
as 12-15828
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY M. POSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE, Sheriff and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Mitchell v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv00499
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Tarz Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sevillet v. Neven et al
as 3:2012cv00129
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Neven
Unknown:
Catherine Cortez-Masto
Petitioner:
Alexander D Sevillet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenshawn Maxey v. William Donat, et al
as 12-15428
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENSHAWN J. MAXEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM DONAT and CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO
Downing v. Graves et al
as 2:2012cv00332
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Brian Connett, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Downing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Posey v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2012cv00313
Respondent:
Catherine Cortez Masto and Sheriff Doug Gillespie
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Posey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 12-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
Larry Adams v. Renee Baker, et al
as 12-15308
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY EDWARD ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Burgess v. Sandaval et al
as 3:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Marshall Burgess, Jr.
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez-Masto, James G. Cox, E.K. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
