Cases 91 - 100 of 412
Reno Rios v. CDCR, et al
as 10-15807
Petitioner - Appellant:
RENO FUENTES RIOS
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON and others
Michael Marks v. Tom Felker, et al
as 10-55514
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM FELKER, Warden and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv02306
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., K. Covington, Does and others
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Brownlow v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
Gregory Brownlow
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton, Fred L Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Barco v. James Tilton
as 10-55335
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOHN A. BARCO
Respondent - Appellant:
JAMES E. TILTON, California Department of Corrections Sacramento, California
Walton v. Tilton et al
as 1:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, James D. Hartley, Lonnie Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sean Shields v. James Tilton
as 10-15432
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEAN KEITH SHIELDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Jesus Bustamante v. James Tilton
as 10-55258
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS BUSTAMANTE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Louis Francis v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-15301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS FRANCIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, LEE ANN CHRONES, LEA ANN GRANNIS and others
James Centobene v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-15269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RODNEY CENTOBENE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, SCOTT KERNAN, Division of Adult Institutions, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
