Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 91 - 96 of 96
HEMPHILL v. ROGERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02162
Plaintiff: JAMES HEMPHILL
Defendant: GRACE ROGERS, GEORGE HAYMAN, RONALD CATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. ROGERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02164
Plaintiff: RAMONCITO RAMOS
Defendant: GRACE ROGERS, GEORGE HAYMAN, RONALD CATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLAUGHTER v. ROGERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02163
Plaintiff: CHARLES SLAUGHTER
Defendant: GRACE ROGERS, GEORGE HAYMAN, RONALD CATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. COUNTY OF MORRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01995
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RICHARDS
Defendant: COUNTY OF MORRIS, MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, MORRISTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COSTA v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00904
Plaintiff: ROBERT J. COSTA, JR.
Defendant: COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, BURLINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., NATHANIEL R. EVANS, II and others
Cross Claimant: BURLINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., NATHANIEL R. EVANS, II, JAMES K. WUJCIK and others
Cross Defendant: JAMES K. WUJCIK, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JULES COLE and others
Counter Claimant: BURLINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, P.A. and NATHANIEL R. EVANS, II
Counter Defendant: JAMES K. WUJCIK, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JULES COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. RICCI
as 3:2007cv00672
Petitioner: RICHARD T. MORRIS
Respondent: MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?