Cases 91 - 100 of 218
PARKER v. MCLENDON et al
as 2:2015cv03839
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MCLENDON, DELORES RAMOS, MARCUS MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUSE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv03822
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ROUSE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv03512
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
JEWELL WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, SHEILA WOODS-SKIPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. O'CONNOR et al
as 2:2015cv03475
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID O'CONNOR, BRAD MOMME, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. HAAZ et al
as 2:2015cv03474
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
SAM HAAZ, DAVID C. SHUTER, PERRY DEMARCO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. RIKER et al
as 2:2015cv03388
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DEREK RIKER, SETH WILLIAMS, ELLEN T. GREENLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLAH v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv03516
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH RASUL-SHABAZZ ALLAH
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, KATHLEEN KANE and BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MEANS et al
as 2:2015cv03266
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
RAYFORD A. MEANS, MCKINLEY, MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2015cv03063
Petitioner:
TORRENCE WAYDE MURRAY
Respondent:
STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
