Cases 91 - 100 of 650
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01572
Respondent:
ANGELA D. CAESAR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BERNIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01250
Plaintiff:
JEAN BERNIER
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MITCHELL v. O'DONOVAN et al
as 1:2020cv01045
Defendant:
VALI ZABLIHEIAN, UNITY HEALTH CARE, INC., TAISEI SUZUKI and others
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Interested Party:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00985
Petitioner:
MARK JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VANDIVERE v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT et al
as 1:2020cv00769
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RAGHUBIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00613
Respondent:
3RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, 2ND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Petitioner:
VINODAH RAGHUBIR and VINODH RAGHUBIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00624
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
DOWTY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00560
Petitioner:
EARL D. DOWTY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00548
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SHEFFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00467
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD, BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ALONZO SHEFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
