Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 91 - 100 of 44,700
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff: Yarnell Hicks
Defendant: Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Chattik et al
as 3:2024cv50172
Plaintiff: Kerry L. Pope
Defendant: Nurse Chattik and Dr. Larry Sy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv03710
Petitioner: Kraig Payne
Respondent: . Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dear v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03712
Plaintiff: Cassius Dear
Defendant: Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
See v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01239
Plaintiff: Robert Benjamin See
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01242
Plaintiff: Darwin L. Stokes
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Doctor Becker, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner: Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent: Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Will County Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv03681
Plaintiff: Steven Lamarr Davis
Defendant: Will County Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Box v. Slattery et al
as 1:2024cv03616
Plaintiff: Martell M. Box
Defendant: Amy Slattery, Frances Milsap, Barea Miggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Osborne et al
as 1:2024cv02323
Plaintiff: Brad Johnson
Defendant: Kennith Osborne, Lotoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?