Cases 101 - 110 of 121
Reyna-Medina v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN CRIMINAL CASE 2:08CR384.
as 2:2009cv00261
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Reyna-Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cardenas-Medina
as 2:2009cv00207
Petitioner:
Sergio Cardenas-Medina
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medina-Mar v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:09CV182. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 2:98CR309-01.
as 2:2009cv00182
Petitioner:
Felipe Medina-Mar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medina-Palomo v. United States Of America DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:09-CV-129. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 2:08-CR-720.
as 2:2009cv00129
Petitioner:
Fernando Medina-Palomo
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medina v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00887
Petitioner:
Soterro Medina, III
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Medina v. Hall et al
as 6:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Juan Lopez-Medina
Defendant:
Warden Hall, Captain Hawthorne, Doctor Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cantu-Medina v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00509
Petitioner:
Karen Aide Cantu-Medina
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Medina v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv01830
Petitioner:
Soterro Medina, III
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medina v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv01563
Petitioner:
David Armendariz Medina
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valdez v. Irving Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv01139
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hugo Valdez
Defendant:
Irving Police Department, Jorge Medina, Flores and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
