Cases 101 - 110 of 528
Maestro v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 3:2019cv01215
Defendant:
BRC, Mental Health Public Defender Staff, The Boulevard and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Maestro, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. People Of The State Of New York
as 7:2019cv04405
Petitioner:
Tony Bryant
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vega v. The People of The State of New York
as 6:2019cv06322
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
Jesus Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. People Of The State Of New York
as 1:2019cv02571
Petitioner:
Tony Bryant
Respondent:
People Of The State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Criss v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv00340
Petitioner:
Isaiah T. Criss
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kravchina v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv01279
Petitioner:
Roman Kravchina
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01149
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn
Watson v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv00707
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Petitioner:
Joseph Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sukhu v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2019cv00410
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
James Sukhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sukhu v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2019cv00059
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
James Sukhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
