Cases 101 - 110 of 404
Hill v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv09561
Defendant:
Medicals Does 1-2, The City of New York, C.O. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Yatuku
as 1:2019cv08912
Defendant:
Correction Officer Yatuku
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Newell
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin v. Trans Union, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv08349
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Larkin
Defendant:
First Electronic Bank, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Un v. Vance et al
as 1:2019cv06378
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York State, Municipal Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Un
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wespi v. Vance et al
as 1:2019cv06379
Defendant:
New York State, The City of New York, Municipal Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Shardiss T. Wespi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streeter v. Vance et al
as 1:2019cv06380
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Streeter
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York State, Municipal Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv06845
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Correction Officer Lin, The City Of New York, and others
Plaintiff:
Price L. Diop and Diop L. Price
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel NYC Law Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Vance et al
as 1:2019cv06382
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York State, Municipal Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Vance et al
as 1:2019cv06373
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York State, Municipal Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Vance et al
as 1:2019cv06375
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York State, Municipal Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
