Cases 111 - 120 of 178
Keys v. Faulk et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Petitioner:
Damon Dares Keys
Respondent:
James Faulk and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aguilar v. Trani et al
as 1:2016cv00972
Petitioner:
Lazaro Aguilar
Respondent:
Travis Trani and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rucker v. Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2016cv00971
Petitioner:
Ronnie Rucker
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and State of Colorado Freemont Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Lou Archuleta and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salazar v. Green
as 1:2016cv00935
Petitioner:
Gary Gilbert Salazar
Respondent:
Steven Green and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Archuletta et al
as 1:2016cv00895
Petitioner:
Jason Brooks
Defendant:
Lou Archuletta and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Gonzalez
Respondent:
John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman, Melissa Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eckley v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2016cv00831
Plaintiff:
Todd Wesley Eckley
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, John Hickenlooper and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv00829
Petitioner:
Alfonso Padilla
Respondent:
John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman, Melissa Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Padilla et al v. Hickenlooper
as 1:2016cv00746
Petitioner:
Alfonso Padilla and Jonathan R. Gonzalez
Respondent:
John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman, Karl Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chapman v. Coffman et al
as 1:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Dan Chapman
Defendant:
Robert Coffman, Anna Brennan, Carmen A. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
