Cases 111 - 120 of 376
HOLMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOLMES
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and JOHN KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEPPARD v. KERESTES
as 2:2014cv00065
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SHEPPARD
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Mayer, Bisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv03055
Petitioner:
Dwayne Robinson
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRATT v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv07476
Petitioner:
PHILLIP PRATT
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2013cv02991
Petitioner:
Kiindu Matthews
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montanez v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv02964
Petitioner:
Rivera Francisco Montanez
Respondent:
John Kerestes and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTYRE v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv07237
Petitioner:
RICHARD MCINTYRE
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curley v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv02960
Petitioner:
Todd H Curley
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv07132
Petitioner:
TYRONE JONES
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
