Cases 111 - 120 of 121
Cisneros-Medina v. United States Of America
as 1:2008cv00099
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Carlos Hugo Cisneros-Medina
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Medina v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv03136
Petitioner:
Peporro Papito Medina
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv01545
Petitioner:
Bernardo Medina
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Peck et al
as 1:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jorge F Medina
Defendant:
Stephen Peck, FNU Medical Providers and Cary Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Tejerina et al
as 4:2007cv02063
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hugo Valdez
Defendant:
Tejerina, Alvaro Martinez and Jorge Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Of America v. Cuevas-Medina
as 3:2007cv00220
Defendant:
Martin Cuevas-Medina
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Valdez v. Medina et al
as 4:2007cv01667
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hugo Valdez
Defendant:
Jorge Medina, Grace Ducate, Jeff Thornel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez Medina v. USA
as 1:2007cv00054
Petitioner:
Gabriel Gonzalez Medina
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medina-Arce v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv00312
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Medina-Arce
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reyna v. Greenwell et al
as 2:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rodriguez Reyna
Defendant:
Thomas Greenwell, Bobby Galvan, Nancy Ninemer and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
