Cases 121 - 130 of 151
Thomas v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv00550
Defendant:
Mark Nooth
Plaintiff:
Edward Andrew Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. McDowall et al
as 3:2013cv00476
Plaintiff:
Andrew Laud Barnett
Defendant:
Dave Brown, Jeff Dickerson, Marti Kyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roshone et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv02358
Defendant:
Cardenes, Lt. Goldston, Kimberly Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Michael Hikes and Andrew Paul Roshone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanger v. USA
as 6:2012cv02268
Petitioner:
Martin Andrew Sanger
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Callaway v. Frasier et al
as 6:2012cv01279
Defendant:
12 employees of Coos County Jail, Conmed Medical Services, Coos County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Monte B. Callaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv00892
Defendant:
Ignacio De La Heras, Andrew Grasley, Jaunita Heimrich and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roshone v. Jost et al
as 2:2011cv01331
Defendant:
C/O Barton, C/O John Doe, C/O Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Roshone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichelson v. De Camp
as 3:2011cv00863
Respondent:
Joe De Camp
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Alfred Andrew Nichelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichelson v. DeCamp
as 6:2011cv00406
Respondent:
Joe DeCamp
Petitioner:
Alfred Andrew Nichelson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00244
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
