Cases 121 - 130 of 159
Rivera v. Perper et al
as 0:2007cv60506
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Joshua Perper, Bob Butterworth, Bill Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00071
Petitioner:
WALDER T CONNER
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keller v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv80301
Petitioner:
Earl Keller
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv20896
Petitioner:
Martin Smith
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections, Department Of Corrections, James McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUNTIN v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D BUNTIN
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RIVERA v. U. S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2007cv00525
Plaintiff:
VINCENT FAUSTINO RIVERA
Defendant:
BOB GATES, GEORGE BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. McDonough et al
as 2:2007cv14074
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antone Peterson
Defendant:
James McDonough and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERVY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD D HERVY
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, ARAMARK CORRECTIONS CORPORATION, DOROTHY BRAXSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00056
Petitioner:
GENERAL GRANT BELL
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 3:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARLOS KING
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH and ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
