Cases 121 - 130 of 39,723
Thomas v. Sheriff Bobb
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Thomas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savalli v. Gulledge
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Ryan Douglas Savalli
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Gulledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Henson
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia
Defendant:
Officer J. Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Tavarres Henderson and Juhiiv Ali Muhammed
Respondent:
Mr Terry Bernard
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Oliver
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTHEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
