Cases 131 - 140 of 947
Cota v. Director of Nursing - ESP et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael Cota
Defendant:
Director of Nursing - ESP, Dr. Hanf and David Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. D. Virus et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
D. Virus, Charles Daniels, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. State of Nevada
as 3:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael V Lane
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cota v. Stark et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Cota
Defendant:
Stark, Director of Nursing ESP and D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobedo v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Carlos Escobedo
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Michael Minev, Bob Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Taiwan Allen
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Isidris Baca and Michael Minev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams and Michael T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael Minev, R. Donnelly, B. Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciolino v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Stephen F.P. Ciolino
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Michael Minev, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
