Cases 131 - 140 of 412
Jose Romero v. CDCR, et al
as 09-16776
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE DAVID ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JAMES E. TILTON and DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Mario Melchionne v. James Tilton
as 09-16777
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO A. MELCHIONNE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Patrick Baylis v. James Tilton
as 09-16715
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK BAYLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Leonan Morgan v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 09-56158
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONAN LEE MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, The Attorney General of the State of California and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary
Diallo Uhuru v. Lon Moskowitz, et al
as 09-56150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant - Appellee:
LON ALAN MOSKOWITZ and JOHN MARSHALL
Defendant:
JUDITH SABLE, M. VELA, D. GONZALEZ and others
Geoffrey Brown v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-56142
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEOFFREY BROWN, AKA John Jacob Reyes
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Ivory v. Tilton, et al.
as 1:2009cv01272
Plaintiff:
Norman Ivory
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, James Hartley, Rosemary Ndoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv05296
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Edward Throop v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-56068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR, STUART RYAN, Former Warden, GEORGE GIURBINO, Former Warden and others
Alvin Ross v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-16442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN RONNEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, CDCR Secretary and DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
