Cases 131 - 140 of 151
Grimes v. Chan et al
as 3:2012cv04822
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Chan and Thoodies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Kings Security Services
as 4:2012cv04551
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Kings Security Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Scemensky et al
as 4:2012cv04552
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Brian Scemensky, Ding, Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Fourth Judicial District Court et al
as 4:2010cv01085
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Fourth Judicial District Court, Mark Torvinen and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Fourth Judicial District Court et al
as 3:2010cv01085
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Fourth Judicial District Court, Mark Torvinen and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Overman et al
as 4:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Overman, Marcussen, Schraeader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Schreader et al
as 4:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Robert Schreader, Cal Train Corp, Perchal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Superior Court of California County of San Mateo et al
as 4:2007cv03647
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of San Mateo
Defendant:
Sarah Boxer and Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Mourgos et al
as 4:2007cv02383
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Mourgos, Boyd, Okulove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Branner et al
as 4:2007cv02372
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Branner, Timpano, Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
