Cases 131 - 140 of 2,003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Figueroa v. Sticht
as 9:2022cv00151
Petitioner:
Edwin Figueroa
Respondent:
Superintendent Thomas Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks et al v. Murray et al
as 6:2022cv06020
Plaintiff:
Lavon D. Parks, Ronnie Lambert, Walter S. Duprey and others
Defendant:
CO Murray, CO Timothy Gilmore, CO Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. McKoy et al
as 9:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Jeff McKoy, Donald E. Venettozzi, Jane/John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa v. Sticht
as 6:2022cv06053
Petitioner:
Edwin Figueroa
Respondent:
Superintendent Thomas Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jack v. Decker et al
as 1:2021cv10958
Petitioner:
Kerron Jack
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Pierce v. McCarthy et al
as 9:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Pierce
Defendant:
Timothy McCarthy, James Donahue, Thomas Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mirabella v. Sticht
as 1:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Todd Mirabella
Respondent:
Thomas J. Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mirabella v. Sticht
as 6:2022cv06026
Petitioner:
Mr. Todd Mirabella and Todd Mirabella
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas J. Sticht and Thomas J. Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mirabella v. Sticht
as 6:2022cv06024
Petitioner:
Mr. Todd Mirabella
Respondent:
Thomas J. Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
