Cases 131 - 140 of 77,389
Ray v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Earl James Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, Dr. Anthony Massaro and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Columbia Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
John S. Gay
Defendant:
Columbia Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Griffin et al
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Griffin, Ballew, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00461
Petitioner:
Victor V. Reed
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steelman v. Steelman et al
as 6:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steelman
Defendant:
James Steelman, Tresa Steelman, Colombo Mummers P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knutson v. Carlton
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Robin Knutson
Defendant:
FNU Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
