Cases 131 - 140 of 18,932
KING v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK S. KING
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, MAXIM CASAS and HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LASANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02427
Petitioner:
TORELLE LASANE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
YOUNG v. SCHLUSSELFELD et al
as 3:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. YOUNG
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHLUSSELFELD, DUANE GRADE, DANIEL CACICIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS et al
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS, DOUGLASS MITCHELL and ASHLEE CHAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ-GUZMAN v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv02156
Petitioner:
EDWIN MARTINEZ-GUZMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUNTER v. SCHULLERY et al
as 1:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
VAN HUNTER
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHULLERY, FATHOM BORG, STEPHANIE BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
as 1:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
HENRY ROMAN
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bynum v. State of New Jersey
as 2:2024cv01720
Petitioner:
Felicia Bynum
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
