Cases 141 - 150 of 156
Rice v. Valdez et al
as 3:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Walter Rice
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, Roseline MG Bakor, NFN Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salter v. Valdez
as 3:2008cv00126
Petitioner:
Edwin Charles Salter
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Valdez et al
as 3:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Dexter Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, NFN Overbey and Frem Pah Gyasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Valdez et al
as 3:2007cv02011
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, NFN Nwankwo, Nicole Vigil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2007cv01510
Plaintiff:
William Kelly, Jr
Defendant:
City of Dallas, City Commissioner's Court, Jason Le Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whaley v. Lew Sterret Justice Center et al
as 3:2007cv01372
Plaintiff:
Cedric Michael Whaley
Defendant:
Lew Sterret Justice Center and Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Valdez
as 3:2007cv01302
Petitioner:
William Jack Toney
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wiethorn v. Valdez
as 3:2007cv00896
Plaintiff:
Carl Wiethorn
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weatherspoon v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2007cv00369
Plaintiff:
Frederick Weatherspoon
Defendant:
NFN Ahmed, Unknown Psych Doctor and Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amir-Sharif v. Dallas County Jail et al
as 3:2007cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Amir-Sharif
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Lupe Valdez, Dallas County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
