Cases 141 - 150 of 39,634
WATSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JORDAN A WATSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran, Strike Officer Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Willie Carl Porter, III
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
