Cases 161 - 170 of 276
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , USP-Marion and Xiao-Ke Gao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kenyon G Reynolds
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Garcon v. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2015cv00797
Plaintiff:
Julien Morena Garcon
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Homeland Security , John Morton , David C. Palmatier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Wendy J Roal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Warren v. Laird et al
as 1:2014cv08544
Defendant:
Paul D. Laird, Leanne LaRina, F. Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv06120
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Counter Terrorism Unit , Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
El-Alamin v. Fricke et al
as 1:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin
Defendant:
Lori Fricke, Jennifer D Halbsgut, Ricardo Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sebolt v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv02797
Plaintiff:
Philip Michael Sebolt
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaw v. Nietzer et al
as 1:2014cv01139
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw, Jr
Defendant:
. Nietzer, . Wolters, . Hinman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Alamin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv01136
Plaintiff:
Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, . Girard and Ricardo Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
