Cases 161 - 170 of 14,012
McDaniel v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Nicholas McDaniel
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robins v. Fairman et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Damien Robins
Respondent:
Gary Fairman, Steve L. Dobrescy, Michael Bondgard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphrey v. County of Henderson et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Darriana Humphrey
Defendant:
County of Henderson, Henderson County Detention Center and LGT Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, T. Cooke, B. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Nelson
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections, T. Cooke, Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Rigney
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Money Coleman
Defendant:
Rigney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurpiel v. Avram et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Justin Anthony Kurpiel
Defendant:
Auram, HDSP and Avram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. CCDC et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Quiwaneca Spikes
Defendant:
CCDC and Overbay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs
Defendant:
Ramirez, Baker and Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austion v. USA
as 2:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Jasmine Bernard Austion
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
