Cases 161 - 170 of 18,932
v. PELULLO et al
as 1:2024cv04007
Defendant:
SALVATORE PELULLO and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARKE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv03988
Petitioner:
ANDREW F. CLARKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BOOKMAN v. CARSTARPHEN et al
as 1:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BOOKMAN
Defendant:
MAYOR VIC CARSTARPHEN, GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, DET. COLIN LEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AYHLLON v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
JOEL CARLO AYHLLON
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRION v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
HECTOR CARRION
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JIMENEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00773
Petitioner:
ELIEZER ALBERTO JIMENEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SOSA v. WOOLSON et al
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
JUAN SOSA
Defendant:
SERGEANT WOOLSON and S.S.C.F. ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ v. PRADIHANANG
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
LILIBETH PRADIHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv03784
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
