Cases 181 - 190 of 10,843
Crain v. McIntosh County Board of Supervisors et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tylor Crain
Defendant:
McIntosh County Board of Supervisors, McIntosh County Sheriff Department and Monica Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steudeman v. Waters
as 6:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dustin Steudeman
Defendant:
Kyle Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Turnkey Medical Services
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department and Turnkey Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. USA
as 4:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Earl Hardy Morrow
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cramer v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hibbard v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Hibbard
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department, Justin Mcree and Jacob Maryhew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SEBASTIAN v. U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 5:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
GEORGE SEBASTIAN
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
