Cases 181 - 190 of 50,107
Mosby v. Miller
as 6:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
Marcus Mosby
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith-Daye v. City of Poughkeepsie et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
David P. Smith-Daye
Defendant:
City of Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County Jail and City of Poughkeepsie Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yung v. People of New York
as 1:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
People of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02446
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Washington v. Martuscello Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv03607
Plaintiff:
Omar Washington
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello Jr., Sgt. Riley and Officer Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duchnowski et al v. LaRusso et al
as 2:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Leo Duchnowski
Defendant:
Anthony LaRusso, Dr. Donna Henig, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Diomande v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
Kassia Diomande
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York Police Officer, John Doe, Unknown Tax ID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
