Cases 181 - 190 of 10,868
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 5:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Mendenhall v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jessie Mendenhall
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Farrow
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David M. Palmer
Defendant:
Nancy Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Seminole Nation Tribal Court
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Ralph Eugene Travis
Respondent:
Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Reheard
as 6:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Brian Tyrone Scott
Respondent:
Deborah A. Reheard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke v. McIntosh County, et al. et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Duke
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al., McIntosh County Jail and McIntosh County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Nelson
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin LaMont Buck Meeks
Defendant:
LaQuesha LaShay Annette Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Gardner et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Andreil R Berry
Defendant:
FNU Gardner and Lawton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Stephens County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Pete Isham
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2024cv00018
Respondent:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Petitioner:
Jimmie McCay, III
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
