Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Scott v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv01879
Defendant:
Cerone, Cardany, John Doe 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Prince D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 7:2018cv07203
Defendant:
C.O. Scaramuzzo, Sgt. Rene, Westchester County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Prince D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavis v. NYC Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv09518
Plaintiff:
David Chavis
Defendant:
NYC Dept. of Corrections, Prince, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Awulye v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv04365
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Prince Awulye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Prince v. Perez
as 1:2017cv02471
Respondent:
Ada Perez
Petitioner:
Darren Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The HonorableMr.PrincedivineMessiahMuhammadx! v. "Mortiere" et al
as 1:2017cv02641
Plaintiff:
The"Honorable"Mr."Prince"divine"Messiah"Muhammad"x"!
Defendant:
"Catherine "Mortiere, "Olga "Sekulich, "New" York" City," et."al. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2017cv00367
Defendant:
Eric Gonzalez, Karen M. Kaliow, M. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06754
Plaintiff:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Defendant:
Rochester, Southern District, Northern District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Speranza et al
as 1:2016cv08860
Plaintiff:
Prince Rodgers
Defendant:
Nicholas Speranza, Esq., Ada Medina, Esq., Allan Focarile, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Sullivan et al
as 6:2016cv06743
Plaintiff:
Prince divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
Ann Sullivan, Philip Griffin, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
