Cases 11 - 20 of 193
(PC) Bennett v. Via Path Technologies et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Via Path Technologies, TouchPayonline.com, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Dale Bennett v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Bennett
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bennett v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Hambun, Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bennett v. Yolo County Superior Court
as 2:2023cv02885
Petitioner:
David Hill Bennett and David Bennett
Respondent:
Yolo County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sivak v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2023cv06253
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
William Fletcher and Mark Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2023cv06249
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
William A. Fletcher and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivak v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennett and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
