Cases 11 - 20 of 495
Clark v. Hill County Jail
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric James Clark
Defendant:
Hill County Jail, Sandy Lynn Cook, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clark v. Euless Police
as 4:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Shackles Duane Clark
Defendant:
Euless Police, Trarrant County Jail Medical Staff, Trarrant County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
James Oliver
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Michael B. Gruver, Asst. Warden Jonathan W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. TDCJ director C & D et al
as 3:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
TDCJ director C & D, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv02264
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Major NFN Gruver, NFN Clark, Ms J Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickerson v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Mr D Skeggs, Mr M Gruver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
