Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Wideman v. Ige et al
as 1:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Clayton H.W. Hee, Kevin Rego, KFVE 5 and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Reginald Wideman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilroy v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Respondent:
Amy M. Murikami, Melvin H. Fujino, Paul R. Mow and others
Petitioner:
William Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Grandinetti v. Hawaii Paroling Authority (HPA) et al
as 1:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti and Francis Anthony Grandinetti
Defendant:
Jesse Macadamia, Annelle C. Amaral, Governor and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilroy v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
William Gilroy
Defendant:
Amy M. Murikami, Melvin H. Fujino, Clare E. Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leong v. Maui County Community Correctional (MCCC) et al
as 1:2018cv00375
Plaintiff:
Corey K. Leong
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Defendant:
Maui Police Department, Joseph E. Cardoza, Maui County Community Correctional (MCCC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Espinda et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Nolan P. Espinda, Department of Public Safety, Deputy Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taulua v. USA
as 1:2018cv00205
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Simeta E. Taulua, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taulua v. USA
as 1:2017cv00526
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Simeta E. Taulua, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
