Cases 11 - 20 of 235
Romero v. Reyes
as 2:2022cv00675
Petitioner:
Frank Romero
Respondent:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Reyes et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Petitioner:
Ronnie C. Walker
Respondent:
E. Reyes and State of Oregon
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Tyler Blewett, Sgt. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Jaclyn Smith, Andrew Glass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Carbajal
as 2:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Harold L. Waller, Jr.
Defendant:
E. Carbajal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Reyes
as 2:2021cv01500
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Inman
Respondent:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West-Howell v. Reyes
as 2:2021cv01300
Petitioner:
Anthony A. West-Howell
Respondent:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lima-Flores v. Underhill et al
as 2:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Santos A. Lima-Flores
Defendant:
Mr. Underhill, Mr. E. Shaw, Dorothy Wettlaufer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slight v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Sue Washburn, C. Kairos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Slight, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Two Rivers Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2021cv00750
Defendant:
E. Reyes, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
