Cases 11 - 20 of 303
HARRIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. HARRIS, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BURLINGTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GALLOWAY v. TARANTO III et al
as 3:2023cv02527
Plaintiff:
RICKY GALLOWAY
Defendant:
LOUIS H. TARANTO III, HON. ROCHELLE GIZENSKI, JSC, MEGHAN M. O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. BERNHARD et al
as 3:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
BRAHEEM H. MILLER
Defendant:
JOEL BERNHARD, RONALD SAGLIMBERE, ASHRAF HAGGAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. UNDER COLOR OF STATE LAW et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER H. EDWARDS
Defendant:
UNDER COLOR OF STATE LAW and TRENTON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AHMAD v. ALFARO et al
as 3:2022cv07512
Plaintiff:
ZAKARIYYA AHMAD
Defendant:
SGT. H. ALFARO, OFFICER MILLER and OFFICER RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv07230
Petitioner:
GERMAINE H. KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
YAEGER v. SONG
as 1:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
SHAWN YAEGER
Defendant:
DR. H. SONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GIORDANO v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv20482
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv20473
Plaintiff:
TYREEN H. WALKER, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. WARREN and EVELYN OLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
