Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Solis-Caceres v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01714
Plaintiff:
Robis Osuel Solis-Caceres
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Solis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv23896
Plaintiff:
Javier Solis
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Florida Attorney General and Department of Legal Affairs for the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOLIS v. JONES
as 4:2015cv00020
Petitioner:
MAURO SOLIS
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON v. BLACKWOOD et al
as 5:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Defendant:
JAMES BLACKWOOD, P MILLER and I SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintero Solis v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv22904
Plaintiff:
Luis Carlos Quintero Solis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Crespo v. Warden Augustine et al
as 1:2013cv22726
Plaintiff:
Freddy Crespo
Defendant:
Warden Augustine, Hector Lopez, Mrs. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis v. State of Florida
as 1:2013cv22233
Plaintiff:
Marvin Solis
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. USA
as 8:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Jose Solis
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mikle v. City of Miami Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv21546
Plaintiff:
Phillip Antwan Mikle, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Miami Police Department, Moise Joseph, Herzen Bain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Solis et al
as 3:2013cv00354
Petitioner:
Charles Francis
Respondent:
E. Solis, Adrian G. Soud Jr., Det. G. Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
