Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Patterson v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv01351
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Reardon and Williams
Plaintiff:
Rob Allen Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 1:2017cv02022
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. Aramark Services, LLC et al.
as 1:2017cv02001
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez
Defendant:
Aramark Services, LLC and Mike Fish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manson v. Pelle et al
as 1:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Manson
Defendant:
Joe Pelle, Boulder County Jail Deputies, Boulder County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling v. Aramark Food Services
as 1:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
Richard Darling
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rob Allen Patterson
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, Correct Care Solutions and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Jefferson County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Alex John Jimenez
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs Office, Aramark Correctional Services Inc. and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. CCS Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2015cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Carter
Defendant:
CCS Correct Care Solutions, Jones, Jenness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02902
Plaintiff:
Elmer L. Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Doris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquardt v. Pelle et al
as 1:2013cv03108
Plaintiff:
Larry W. Marquardt
Defendant:
Joe Pelle, Boulder County Commissioners and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
