Cases 11 - 20 of 21
DAVIDSON v. WILSON et al
as 1:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
R. WILSON, N. ARMSTRONG, J. ABBOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2012cv01832
Petitioner:
LORNE ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRAWFORD V. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT
as 2:2011cv06266
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT and SANDRA ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv04388
Plaintiff:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2010cv01340
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CHIN and ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2009cv06378
Petitioner:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. SOMERSET COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 3:2009cv06109
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. HARRIS
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PAUL ARMSTRONG, WAYNE FOREST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. IACOVNE et al
as 1:2009cv01606
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. HARRIS
Defendant:
JOSEPH IACOVNE, A. HUGHES, J. ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ARMSTRONG v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv06131
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ARMSTRONG v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2008cv00569
Petitioner:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY and SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
