Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Oppenhammer v. B.O.P.
as 3:2011cv00402
Respondent: B.O.P.
Petitioner: Lisa N Oppenhammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 4:2010cv00095
Respondent: Director of B.O.P., Warden Keith Hall, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Rene Martinez-Lerma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 4:2010cv00084
Respondent: Director of B.O.P., Warden Keith Hall, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Rene Martinez-Lerma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia-Aguilera v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Respondent: B.O.P., United States Of America and Warden
Petitioner: Cesar Valentin Garcia-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campos v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00025
Defendant: B.O.P., United States Of America and Warden RCDC III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gil v. B.O.P. et al
as 4:2009cv00051
Petitioner: Guillermo Gil
Respondent: B.O.P. and U.S.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Penaloza-Penaloza v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00173
Petitioner: Pedro Penaloza-Penaloza
Respondent: FNU Justice, B.O.P. Director, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 6:2009cv00035
Petitioner: Rene Martinez-Lerma
Respondent: Keith Hall, Director of B.O.P., U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pena v. Hall et al
as 6:2008cv00100
Petitioner: Angel Pena
Respondent: Keith Hall, B.O.P. Director, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?