Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Love v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2014cv03195
Petitioner:
Leslie Love
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Larry James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Army, Monty William Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huff v. O'Neil et al
as 5:2013cv03099
Plaintiff:
Dana Jamal Huff
Defendant:
Christopher O'Neil, Brad Lancaster, Tobi Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish (ID 25121) v. Lee et al
as 5:2012cv03196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Brad Lee and Kristi Oak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. May et al
as 5:2012cv03044
Plaintiff:
Duncan L. Ellis
Defendant:
Brad May and Bobbie Derks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of Shawnee County, Kansas et al
as 5:2010cv03098
Plaintiff:
Garry E. Williams
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Shawnee County, Kansas, Richard Kline, Shannon Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cline et al
as 5:2010cv03034
Petitioner:
Brad Joseph Jones
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03171
Petitioner:
Brad Lee Jones
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Hillebert
as 5:2008cv03223
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Lindsey
Defendant:
Brad Hillebert
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Roberts et al
as 5:2007cv03050
Plaintiff:
Kodi A Thomas
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Susie Gabriel, Tischa Phares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
