Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Anderson v. Dade Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2014cv01164
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution, F-Dorm Security, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Bell
as 8:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Ms. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Officer Struder et al
as 8:2013cv02945
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Struder, Officer Kovaliski, Security One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. FNU Forestyer et al
as 8:2013cv01832
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Forestyer and FNU Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2013cv01831
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv02255
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Zep. C.I., Officer Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Department of Corrections
as 8:2012cv00919
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAULKENBERRY v. ELLIS et al
as 5:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
RYAN STEVEN FAULKENBERRY
Defendant:
J ELLIS, W RUFFIN, M SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hans C. Anderson vs Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv00725
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Zephyrhills C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv00662
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
